Need guidance? Enjoy unlimited support from 6AM-6PM and a 24-hour lodgement services. π Call 08 6722 8806
Property has always been one of the strongest attractions for Australians considering a self-managed super fund (SMSF). The idea of holding a tangible asset, earning rental income, and benefiting from long-term capital growth inside a tax-advantaged structure is compellingβparticularly for investors who distrust volatility or want greater control over asset selection.
However, buying property through an SMSF is not the same as buying property personally.
In 2026 and beyond, tighter compliance standards, Division 296 considerations, stricter valuations, and conservative lender policies mean that SMSF property strategies are under more scrutiny than at any point in the past decade.
This article explains:
This is essential reading for anyone considering property inside an SMSF.
SMSF lending is deliberately conservative. This is not accidental.
Unlike personal borrowing, SMSF borrowing:
The responsibility for compliance sits with the trustee, but lenders also face regulatory risk. As a result, SMSF property loans are assessed with far less tolerance for ambiguity.
SMSFs are only allowed to borrow under a Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement (LRBA).
Under an LRBA:
This structure requires:
Errors at setup can permanently compromise compliance.
SMSFs may acquire:
SMSFs cannot:
Breaches here are among the most commonβand costly.
SMSF property loans require significantly higher deposits than personal loans.
Typical parameters:
Lenders want to see:
Overleveraged SMSFs are viewed as high risk.
SMSF loan terms are more conservative:
Because SMSFs cannot easily inject capital or restructure income, cash flow stress is a critical risk.
Trustees must ensure:
Property inside an SMSF must always satisfy the sole purpose testβproviding retirement benefits.
This means:
Auditors focus heavily on property-related compliance because breaches are binary: compliant or not.
Property valuation has become a critical issueβespecially under Division 296.
Why valuations matter:
Trustees should expect:
Informal or outdated valuations are increasingly risky.
While Division 296 taxes earnings rather than assets, it indirectly affects SMSF property strategies by:
Property-heavy SMSFs near thresholds must model growth scenarios, liquidity requirements, and exit flexibility.
Ignoring this interaction can trap trustees in inflexible positions.
Common reasons for rejection include:
In many cases, the issue is not the propertyβbut the structure.
Refinancing an SMSF property loan is harder than refinancing personally.
Challenges include:
A structure that was acceptable years ago may not meet todayβs standards.
SMSF property strategies may be appropriate when:
Property should support the SMSFβnot dominate it.
Each mistake reduces flexibility and increases long-term risk.
Broker360 works with SMSF trustees who want lending structures lenders trust, clean compliance from day one, and property strategies that remain financeable.
We focus on:
In the current environment, structure quality is leverage.
Disclaimer: Information shared is general in nature and does not constitute financial, tax, legal, or credit advice. Please seek professional advice for your specific circumstances.